GeoMemo
MON, JUN 29 · EDT
CountriesUnited StatesOperational risk · 90 days
Operational risk · 90-day outlookLast updated 2026-06-28 · 1 day ago · stale

United States

An enterprise-decision view of United States’s operational risk over the next 90 days. Scenario probabilities, sanctions exposure, chokepoints, and political outlook — for risk officers, supply chain teams, and analysts who need to act, not just read.

Stability score?Stability scoreWeighted composite of seven pillars (conflict, events, arms, economy, market, sanctions, humanitarian). Higher = healthier. Recomputed daily. Lower = greater operational risk.
46.5
Critical risk
Headline signal · 90-day event volume
United States · annotated 90-day event volume
33,338
total events · 90 daily data points
2026-04-012026-05-162026-06-29
Source · intelligence_events · all severity tiersHover any annotated dot for full milestone
Risk matrix · five dimensions
Political
14Stable
Security
82Critical
Economic
23Stable
Regulatory
100Critical
Operational
71Elevated
Risk dimensions are derived from the 7 stability pillars. Higher score = more risk (inverted from the stability score, where higher = healthier). Operational is a weighted composite intended for enterprise-decision use.
Scenario probabilities · next 90 days
01
Escalating US-China technology decoupling triggers supply-chain disruptions in semiconductors and EV markets

The Trump administration is systematically restricting Chinese technology access while maintaining selective export controls on US AI firms. Enforcement actions (chip seizures) and product bans indicate active supply-chain weaponization. Hithium's US manufacturing expansion suggests Chinese firms are adapting, but this will intensify US counter-measures over 90 days.

Indicators · what would confirm
  • Polestar EV ban from US market effective 2027
  • $13M AI chip seizure at Kuala Lumpur Airport
  • Trump administration pressure on OpenAI GPT-5.6 release
  • Partial lift of Anthropic export restrictions signaling selective tech weaponization
  • Chinese battery maker Hithium expanding overseas manufacturing to circumvent controls
75%
probability
high impact
02
Unilateral tariff threats against EU (100% digital services tax tariffs) trigger transatlantic trade escalation and retaliatory measures

Trump has issued explicit, repeated tariff threats against EU nations, demonstrating intent to weaponize trade policy. The EU's prior approval of a limited trade deal suggests failed comprehensive negotiation. Over 90 days, escalatory tariff announcements are highly likely, triggering EU counter-tariffs and potential trade agreement unraveling.

Indicators · what would confirm
  • Trump threatens 100% tariffs on EU digital services tax (stated twice in 30d)
  • Claims to override existing trade agreements
  • EU approved US trade deal capping import tariffs (suggesting prior negotiation failure)
  • Trade tensions described as ongoing and escalating
  • Spain's rare-earth discovery signals EU supply-chain diversification from US dependency
70%
probability
high impact
03
Humanitarian crisis deepens from mass deportation of 1.3M+ immigrants under Supreme Court ruling, triggering domestic unrest and international diplomatic friction

Legal authority for mass deportations is now established. Implementation over 90 days will displace hundreds of thousands, triggering humanitarian agency intervention, potential civil disobedience, and diplomatic complaints from source countries. While high probability, impact is domestic/humanitarian rather than systemic geopolitical.

Indicators · what would confirm
  • Supreme Court ruled 6-3 permitting deportation of 350K Haitians and 6K Syrians
  • Ruling opens pathway for deportations affecting 1.3M immigrants from 17 countries
  • Trump administration framing immigration as national security priority
  • US Ambassador to India reassuring on immigration targeting (defensive posture)
  • South American nations asserting sovereignty amid US-China competition (potential destination resistance)
65%
probability
moderate impact
04
Strait of Hormuz remains contested flashpoint with recurring tanker attacks, disrupting 21% of global petroleum trade and spiking energy prices

Active tanker attacks in Hormuz indicate either Iranian proxy action or regional instability creating collision risk. US-Iran military strikes and UN condemnation suggest ongoing confrontation. While Trump administration seeks transactional relationships (requested Saudi cooperation on escorts per evidence), uncontrolled escalation remains plausible over 90 days.

Indicators · what would confirm
  • Oil tanker attacked in Strait of Hormuz (June 28, 2026)
  • Broader four-month regional conflict ongoing
  • Recent US military strikes on Iran (February 2026) escalated tensions
  • 100-day Hormuz crisis previously pushed 5.8M into acute hunger
  • UN condemning US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites as international law violations
60%
probability
high impact
05
Domestic political polarization intensifies as Trump reasserts executive power over AI, immigration, and military privatization, testing institutional constraints

Trump administration is consolidating executive control over strategic sectors (AI, military, finance) and claiming unprecedented personal power. While institutional resistance exists, recent Supreme Court rulings suggest weakened checks. Over 90 days, further executive overreach is likely, potentially triggering Congressional or judicial response.

Indicators · what would confirm
  • Trump views himself as 'most powerful man the planet has ever known' (per new book)
  • Trump administration exerting political influence over OpenAI and Anthropic AI releases
  • Trump proposes converting US military to 'rent-a-cop' service (demanding payment from allies)
  • Trump launched World Liberty Financial crypto venture (personal wealth consolidation)
  • Supreme Court granted Trump administration power to override immigrant protections (judicial deference)
55%
probability
moderate impact
Watchlist · next 90 days
01
Implementation timeline and scale of immigrant deportations under Supreme Court ruling
Indicator · Number of deportation orders issued, source-country diplomatic protests, humanitarian organization emergency declarations
80%
02
EU retaliation measures following US 100% tariff threats on digital services tax
Indicator · EU announced counter-tariffs, trade negotiations breakdown, suspension of US trade agreements
70%
03
Frequency and severity of Strait of Hormuz attacks; oil price spike thresholds
Indicator · Tanker attack incidents per week, OPEC+/IEA emergency session calls, WTI/Brent crude price > $100/bbl
65%
04
Chinese technology firms' adaptation strategies (manufacturing relocation, supply-chain circumvention)
Indicator · Announcements of US/allied-nation manufacturing hubs (e.g., Hithium Texas expansion), US export control effectiveness metrics
75%
05
Trump administration AI policy coherence: selective export restrictions vs. corporate autonomy claims
Indicator · Further restrictions on OpenAI/Anthropic/other AI firms, Congressional AI regulation proposals, industry lobbying intensity
60%
06
US-Iran escalation trajectory post-nuclear strikes and recent tanker attack
Indicator · Iranian retaliatory statements/actions, US military posture changes in Persian Gulf, IAEA inspection disruptions
58%
Political outlook · 90-day judgments
Trump administration consolidating executive power over strategic sectors amid weakened institutional checks; transactionalism replacing alliance-based foreign policy

The Trump administration is systematically concentrating control over AI, military, immigration, and financial sectors through executive action, with recent Supreme Court rulings on immigrant protections suggesting diminished judicial oversight. Trump's self-described role as 'most powerful man the planet has ever known' reflects maximalist executive ideology. Domestically, factional tensions are apparent between institutional constraints and executive overreach, with no imminent succession risk given Trump's dominance of the Republican Party. Internationally, the administration is replacing alliance commitments with transactional arrangements (demanding payment for military protection, threatening tariffs against allies), fundamentally destabilizing post-Cold War security architecture.

high confidence
Sanctions exposure
Sanctioned entities tied to United States
4K
US maintains active multilateral sanctions regimes targeting Iran, Sudan, Russia (referenced indirectly); recent additions focus on individual actors in Sudan and technology controls on China
Active regimes
Iran: Comprehensive economic sanctions (referenced via military strikes, nuclear site attacks, Hormuz tensions); ongoing enforcementSudan: Targeted sanctions on 8 individuals/entities supporting RSF and SAF (June 28, 2026)China: Technology export controls on AI chips, EV manufacturing (Polestar ban effective 2027)Venezuela: Implied sanctions context (earthquake response coordination)
Recent changes
US sanctioned 8 individuals for supplying explosives to Sudan civil conflict (June 27, 2026)
Polestar (Chinese-backed EV) banned from US sales effective 2027 citing national security (June 26, 2026)
Trump administration partially lifted Anthropic AI export restrictions for select entities (June 27, 2026) - selective relaxation signal
$13M AI chip seizure at Kuala Lumpur Airport (June 26, 2026) indicates enforcement escalation
Outlook ·US sanctions policy is shifting toward selective technology weaponization rather than blanket economic embargoes. Iran sanctions remain comprehensive but Trump administration messaging suggests negotiation openness (MOU signed per evidence). Sudan targeting is narrowly focused on conflict-fueling actors. Expect 90-day expansion of AI/semiconductor export controls against China and Chinese-affiliated firms, with potential sector-specific exceptions for allies (UAE, Israel). Technology controls will intensify as primary sanction mechanism.
Trade chokepoints
Strait of Hormuz (Persian Gulf to Arabian Sea)
Crude oil, natural gas, refined petroleum products
Exposure
21%
Disruption
65%
US-EU transatlantic trade (goods and services)
Technology services, automotive, industrial machinery, digital services
Exposure
18%
Disruption
70%
US-China semiconductor and advanced manufacturing supply chains
AI chips, semiconductors, battery manufacturing, EV components
Exposure
15%
Disruption
75%
Southeast Asia to US technology exports (Malaysia, Vietnam, Taiwan)
Advanced chips, AI hardware, consumer electronics
Exposure
12%
Disruption
68%
Active conflicts involving United States
Iran warEscalation 100
Persian Gulf conflictEscalation 100
Middle East conflictEscalation 100
Mexico drug cartel violenceEscalation 66
Strait of Hormuz crisisEscalation 100
West Asia conflictEscalation 100
+Glossary & methodology

Operational risk here means the practical exposure that a business, government, or institution operating in or around United States would face. We model five dimensions (Political / Security / Economic / Regulatory / Operational) using a weighted blend of seven underlying pillars.

Scenarios are generated daily under ICD 203 analytic-tradecraft standards. Each scenario carries a calibrated probability, named indicators that would confirm or deny it, and impact across regulatory / kinetic / economic axes.

This page is the deeper-read companion to the United States country page for risk officers and operators. The country page covers daily news, judgments, and watchlist; this page covers 90-day strategic outlook.

← Back to United States daily brief